on lent
February 27, 2009
On the other hand, maybe it’s just that I’ve seen Chocolat one too many times, but something about self-denial for the sake of faith really rubs me the wrong way. I guess I’m just reacting against the dualism I’ve so often encountered – the idea that the more of ‘this world’ I reject, the more I focus only on my ideas about Christ, the more spiritual I will be. I don’t believe that anymore, and I don’t want to behave as though I do. I agree with Pere Henri in Chocolat, at the end of the movie when he sticks it to the Comte:
I’m not sure what the theme of my homily today ought to be. Do I want to speak of the miracle of Our Lord’s divine transformation? Not really, no. I don’t want to talk about His divinity. I’d rather talk about His humanity. I mean, you know, how He lived His life, here on Earth. His kindness, His tolerance… Listen, here’s what I think. I think that we can’t go around… measuring our goodness by what we don’t do. By what we deny ourselves, what we resist, and who we exclude. I think… we’ve got to measure goodness by what we embrace, what we create… and who we include.
I think the common theme between choosing to focus on kindness and tolerance or giving up chocolate and coffee, is that we choose to be intentional for 40 days, in a way that we might not during other parts of the year. For lent, whether you choose to give up or to embrace, I would encourage you to be intentional about prayer, about reflection, about considering what kind of preparations or changes might need to be made in your mind and heart as we look to celebrate the victory of the kingdom of God over death.
[...] the best way for me to interrupt my current routine, to reflect on the preparation for Easter as I encouraged my church to do this week, is to be intentional about blogging for the next 40 (okay, 38) days. How [...]
To me, lent seems like just another distraction. I am trying to decide whether things like lent are relevant to the new life or not. On one level I can appreciate the value of manifesting our understanding of Christ’s sacrifice physically. It makes sense to me that we experience life and tradition that way. However, in a larger way, I am a bit cynical about the prospect that people from our culture can engage in activities like lent in a healthy manner. I think we are so engrained with the belief that God is interested in our efforts to please him that its not even conscious anymore. Like recovered addicts we are magnetically drawn to behaviors that emulate our former patterns. In small ways things like lent give us pieces of what full blown religion used to provide. A sense of accomplishment, belonging, authenticity and legitimacy. You know whats even more authentic and legitimate than lent? Real, normal, authentic life. That, after all, is what Jesus came to give us anyway.
So for me, activities and traditions that encourage me to performance in a spiritual sense are out. If the whole world skipped lent for 10 years, who would care? People with nothing better to do. Okay thats harsh. I like birthdays and easter and christmas as much as the next guy. Maybe the best concentric circle to place lent in would be somewhere near Robbie Burns day. If you’re Japanese:)